The family gathered for dinner this weekend. At any given time there can be five laptops open in the family room, text messages crossing the dinner table, iPhotos snapped and sent to the niece away at school, at least one cell phone conversation passed around the room, an occasional video, one buzzing Blackberry, and a circulating dog on the prowl for wayward edibles.
There was more than the usual tech talk at this gathering. Two of the family recently added a new product to their eStore and there was a lot of discussion about how to optimize sales: who to target, where to market, what adwords to use. This new product requires the customer to submit a high-resolution digital photo (or a print, by snail mail) during the order process, so I suggested linking the eStore to Flickr.
There were at least 12 of us in the room, among them a few high school students, a hairstylist, two grandparents, a guy who looks like Ray Liotta, a graphic artist, two real estate professionals, the owner of the eStore, and me. At least eight asked, “What’s Flicker?” So I explained the “what” and “why” of “Flicker.”
- It’s a photo sharing website.
- You can upload photos as large as 20MB and download sizes from 75×75 square to original.
- Plays better than many ISPs for emailing the hi-resolution stuff.
- Offers APIs for creating web services to streamline (and socialize) the ordering process.
- It can be free, or at least inexpensive.
I love my brother-in-law, but he argues like… um… (immunity, please)… a 1.0 librarian: “I guarantee you that the majority of people who buy these things won’t be using Flicker.
How does he know? I mean, the guy knows a lot of things, but how does he know that most of the people who might buy his product aren’t using Flicker? The real story, which he admits, is that deciding which photo to download from Flicker would be more work than having the customer just email one photo. OK, I said, but what if the customer’s email provider denies attachments larger than 2MB? What if the customer works around that limit by sending one crappy photo that can’t be used to make a good product? Huh? Then what, smartypants?
He’s thinkin’ from his keyboard and not from his customers’.
And it’s Flickr. F-L-I-C-K-R. Dot com.
Filed under: @ruth, immunity island, social software | No Comments »